A relatively generalised raw point theory

All particles could be described as points in space/existence with a characteristic: magnetic, spinning, electical, fast, slow, attractive, non-attractive… etcetera etcetera.

I mention this as the more I read, the more I find that the odd stone in the garden is odd.

It may have in it a grain of garnet or quartz 4.3 billion years old.

And that the atoms in it are made of neutrons and electrons and protons, and that collisions by neutrinos may have knocked a photon or gamma ray particle off it. And those bits are made of points. Or strings. 

Glaciers may have rolled over it before it being flung into the garden by a dinosaur killing comet colliding few klicks away. A while ago.

Anyway, the point of this is to say/ask is that if all particles are in fact just special points, how many points fit into a point to ensure the Big Bang banged from a point?

Maybe it was Big Point Bang?

A sore point? Exploding pimple?

About tone

Widowed exRigPigGeo 50yr old dad of 4 'teens', is doin' job raisin' kids, misses a lot of things. Family (close and extended) and Friends - an important part in our of life. Likes gadgets, speedsailing, reading (SF), geology/archeology, maps. Coffee monster- burnt out one espresso maker too many. Have to have plenty spare "moccona" in cupboard. Things I miss- Tarn. The rig life and income. A lot of sailing. Tarn. gonna try to break 35 knots speedsurfing- or 70knh
This entry was posted in Geology, Humour, Word play and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s